Tag: public domain
Artists and Copyright Law – Part 3
by jessica on Jul.29, 2009, under JOURNAL: Nature, art, cultural perspectives
What’s “royalty-free”?
Artists searching for reference material on the internet run across many collections listed as “free photos” or “royalty-free” – but this can be something of a catch-22. These terms are NOT equivalent to public domain (i.e., unrestricted use). Generally, royalty-free just means that you don’t have to pay a leasing fee for using the photo, and that intellectual copyright still applies. This is to differentiate them from websites that actually sell stock photos under varying usage licenses. Most free-photo sites will have disclaimers saying that their photos are “100% free” to download, but are restricted to personal or educational uses only. Granted, this is fair, but it’s easy to be misled by thinking that “free” is an all-encompassing term. Check the source to find out just what is meant by “free.”
If you intend to draw heavily on any kind of visual reference material for commercial art (that is, art you intend to sell) make sure to do the research to confirm that it is public domain, or get the owner’s permission.
Next: Rights-Managed and Creative Commons
Artists and Copyright Law – Part 2
by jessica on May.11, 2009, under JOURNAL: Nature, art, cultural perspectives
Public domain is the term for media that is totally free for the public to use. If you’re an artist looking for a reference photo to model a painting after, these are the words you want to see.
Previously I said that practically all works are protected by intellectual copyright – and that’s true, but there are a few exceptions. For example:
- Copyright does not apply to works before 1921. The concept of legal copyright just didn’t exist then. This generally applies to historical photographs, prints in old books, etc. They are considered to be in the public domain – that is, public property.
- Some works may be in the public domain if their copyright has lapsed (as in the case of the Edward Curtis collection).
- The creator of the work actually releases his/her work into the public domain. This means they graciously give their work to the public without retaining any rights to it, and anybody can do with it what they wish.
Using pictures from the public domain, however, assumes that you don’t claim rights to the concept – saying you actually came up with the original. So you could sell a painting that includes an image of the Mona Lisa, but I wouldn’t try saying that you were the one who came up with the original idea.
Also, your work doesn’t affect the status of the original, so you can’t restrict others from using it as well. Therefore you can claim copyright only to your version of it. This can mean that any number of individuals may create a painting based on the exact same public domain image – provided they are using the image as their reference, and not each others’ paintings.




